Note added on Jan 30, 2016. Here is a link with an interesting article on the ethical considerations of this research:
http://gizmodo.com/ethicists-voice-concerns-over-creation-of-humanized-au-1754939733
~~~
Original post:
“The laboratory monkeys run obsessively in circles, largely ignore their peers and grunt anxiously when stared at.”
(My Italics and bold face)
This is the very first line of a newspiece reporting on a line of research that resulted in the creation of a type of monkeys that display behavioral similarities to autistic humans. You can read more about the specifics here and here, but briefly, researchers engineered embryos of crab-eating macaque monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) to express extra copies of a gene with the uninspiring name MECP2. Normally, this gene seems to control aspects of the proper functioning of nerve cells. In humans, when extra copies of this gene are present (or when the gene is mutated in a particular way) closely correlates with the expression of autism symptoms & behaviors.
Truth be told, I find the science of this research fascinating, and those who know me know very well that I have a personal interest on the phenomenon of autism. Similarly, those who know me know very well that I am a scientist who knows a thing or two about neuroscience research.
However, I am not going to talk about science today. You see, as counterintuitive as it sounds, I think that this research is wrong. As I commented in the link:
“I am the father of a young man with autism, whom I love with all my heart. I am also a scientist, and I think that this research is wrong. Why create these animals on purpose, with the explicit objective of them to suffer? It is not like they are going to give them any support like we do to autistic humans. These poor animals will have a mind and will be terrified by a world that they are not equipped to understand…”
As a dad, I am not very fond of autism (this is quite the understatement and please, pretty please, ***Read*** this post before judging me!). I know how autism affects the life of my son, as well as how it affects the life and dynamics of my whole family. The most optimistic of us oftentimes talk about disabilities, including autism, as blessings and who am I to disagree?
However, I worry about my son, I worry about what is going to happen to him when I am gone. My wife and I are planning ahead, taking steps for him to be taken care of when the time comes, but, what about the love that only we can give him? It is a safe bet that all parents agree that nobody takes care of your own as yourself…
In fact, I have fantasized about having the means to stay with him for the rest of his life. This resulted in my first (and only so far) attempt to try some science fiction writing. If you want to know more about it, you can go here).
Anyway, about autism, it is true that there are some beautiful moments related to it (please see here and here for a couple of examples). My son is witty, sweet and has an actually beautiful mind, but it is also undeniable that he suffers because of his autism. We also suffer because of it. For example, just ask any mom with a child on the spectrum! Believe it or not, for a mom, it compares to combat-related stress!
Anxiety and despair are common effects of autism. This is why I cringed when I read the very first line about the aforementioned research on monkeys. My “trigger” was the word “anxiously”. I felt so sorry about these poor animals!
I am fully aware that animal research is a very controversial topic. As a scientist (heck, as a thinking human being), I acknowledge that most of us we would not even be alive if it weren’t for it; end of story. Now, I am not trained in ethics, therefore I cannot provide an intelligent or even coherent comment on the ethics of specific line of research in these monkeys, on the general animal research controversy, or even on the ethics of consuming animals for food for that matter. However…
This autism-monkey-related research feels wrong, plain wrong.
We are talking about primates here!
I know; the question “Where do we draw the line?” presents itself. For example, there are rodent models of autism used in research right now. Someone could make a case that autism research in mice and rats is also wrong, but honestly, I have no strong feelings against it, and I fully admit that I am guilty of a kind of speciesism here, you’ll get no argument from me in this aspect.
Nonetheless, I argue that even though we do not know exactly what a human mind is (let alone the phenomenon of consciousness in general), if any animals are going to experience what a mind is, it will be primates.
Just imagine that:
**Your whole purpose in life is to experience anxiety, among other unpleasant feelings…
**Your basic biology precludes you from relating with members of your own species…
**The “default state” of your mind is confusion and fear…
**You will receive absolutely no help, simply because your usefulness depends on your condition…
**You will not even know that you can feel better because you have never known any other reality and again, that no one will rescue you from that reality…
I am sure you can imagine more things here.
For these among other reasons, it seems to me that there is something fundamentally wrong with creating what I believe is a sentient being, with the explicit purpose of suffering. Moreover, as the article states, some scientists doubt that this particular type of monkeys is an optimal model for autism after all, so there is the very real possibility that this suffering will have no silver lining whatsoever.
All of these being said, I must admit that part of me wonders what would I think if I was assured without a doubt that this research will help my boy…
Is this what temptation feels like?
~~~~
**If you like what I write, kindly spread the word about this blog!
**I am a published writer! For my Amazon author page, click here.
**Want to see more of the things I write? Go here for some other posts.
**Shoot me a message if you have any questions! (orpagan@yahoo.com)
**You can subscribe to my blog! Just go to the “Home” page, right hand side.
**Here’s a link to my Facebook page
**Finally, my Twitter name: @Baldscientist
**For the customary (and very important) disclaimers please go to my “About” page…
I’ve still not been able to locate any information on the ethical review process or systems in place at the Shanghai Institute. I even sent an email to their general inquiries address (though received no response).
Secondary to this, for me, is whether or not the rest of the scientific community is going to look the other way on this issue, so that they can use the data gathered by these less-ethically-encumbered researchers who have no problem with this kind of breach.
It feels so wrong to me on many levels. Like so many other disease/disorders(?) I’d like to see us find a way to cure them, but not if it means we are going to first try but not know if it will truly help, experimenting on helpless creatures. My gosh, what must those poor monkeys be going through? At least when humans are born with this, there are people who take care of them and love them.